Were we playing a pack line defense in the second half? If not, what was it?
I have never seen us play that style of D before, and I am not sure what to make of it. It seemed like a 3-2 zone for awhile, then a 2-3 zone, then straight man, then a box and one. It was definitely different. I didn't particularly like it all the time, because we seemed to be giving them more wide-open looks than normal, and also allowing them to move uncontested to the free-throw line.
But at the same time, they didn't really convert a ton off of it. It seemed to me that we played our normal defense for most or all of the first half, then switched it up because they went on that run to end the first half.
I have never seen us play that style of D before, and I am not sure what to make of it. It seemed like a 3-2 zone for awhile, then a 2-3 zone, then straight man, then a box and one. It was definitely different. I didn't particularly like it all the time, because we seemed to be giving them more wide-open looks than normal, and also allowing them to move uncontested to the free-throw line.
But at the same time, they didn't really convert a ton off of it. It seemed to me that we played our normal defense for most or all of the first half, then switched it up because they went on that run to end the first half.