Autocorrect?Walz with a bad, bad shot there at the end. Dusan was killing his man but somehow he didn’t factor thanks to Mooney.
Autocorrect?Walz with a bad, bad shot there at the end. Dusan was killing his man but somehow he didn’t factor thanks to Mooney.
He wasnt in the game???? I thought they didnt get him the ball but was in the game.Does anyone have any idea why Dusan wasn't in the game ? Insanity
Actually couldn't sub him in there I don't think. He was out before they scored and they took a 30 sec. timeout. Don't think we are allowed to sub there. Could if they took a full timeout. Silly rule, but pretty sure thats the rule.What was Mooney thinking leaving his best shooter on the bench?
Holy shit!!! Why????Hard to get the ball to a guy who's sitting next to you on the bench.
FifyWhat crap ending . No offensive plan, no play nothing. Come on Admin, get a grip on your coach.
Because Mooney, of course.Holy shit!!! Why????
Nobody on our team was really playing great defense, he should have kept him in the game. Dusan was our only guy scoring and was making all of his free throws.Actually couldn't sub him in there I don't think. He was out before they scored and they took a 30 sec. timeout. Don't think we are allowed to sub there. Could if they took a full timeout. Silly rule, but pretty sure thats the rule.
It debatable whether it was a good move to take him out after the FT because we had no timeouts. So had URI scored and NOT taken a timeout, we would have had to go on offense without him. But he is awful defensively, so I guess felt like he needed to take him out.
Guessing they (announcers) don't really know that rule (assuming I am right - which I may not be). But I do think thats the rule and its the only thing that makes sense!
This is the stuff of which extensions are made.If you have no timeouts left and you know you will get another possession, you have to leave in your best offensive player. Mooney legacy continues.
Love that Scott called him out not once, but twice.Mooney leaves the best player out on next to last possession. Enough is enough. Unger gets it, Bob Black, crickets
fifymooniocrity said tried to put Dusan in, but ref woud not allow as ref called TO, mooniocrity said new rule on him.
Never forget, also losingest.Winningest coach in school history and he doesn't know the rules.
1) Coaching strategy or 2) saving him for next game.idk what prevented neskovic from being on court at the end there, but it’s inexcusable whatever the reason may have been.
Someone please make it make sense.
I guess he is excused then. Hahaha. He says it like he knows there will be no consequences and its no big deal. “I F’ed up. So what?”Chris said tried to put Dusan in, but ref woud not allow as ref called TO, Chris said new rule on him.
That’s why he’s also the losingest coach in school history. Bad with the good.Winningest coach in school history and he doesn't know the rules.
I addressed this in the other thread also, but this focus (Mooney et al.) on the 'rule' being the issue is pure insanity. How do you expect to get him back in the game regardless of the rule? You have no timeouts... and you know you have no timeouts. What magical mechanism will allow you to sub him back in the game.... after a miss or make?Even better, he said "it happened twice"!!! So after it happened the first time tonight, YOU KNEW. So why the F did you let it happen AGAIN with the game on the line in overtime?? Unbelievable.