Mens: NET '24-'25 Rankings
- Thread starter Section9.RowD
- Start date
40. Dayton
57. Bona
58. Rhody
69. Loyola
72. VCU
79. Mason
114. Davidson
118. La Salle
129. GW
134. St. Joe's
228. SLU
229. UMass
256. Fordham
259. UR
326. Duquesne
stats.ncaa.org
57. Bona
58. Rhody
69. Loyola
72. VCU
79. Mason
114. Davidson
118. La Salle
129. GW
134. St. Joe's
228. SLU
229. UMass
256. Fordham
259. UR
326. Duquesne
NCAA Statistics
SOS of 336, and that doesn't even include the D-II teams.
90. Louisiana Tech
147. Maine
226. Bucknell
262. Charlotte
273. Marist
318. Ball State
Remaining OOC:
2. Auburn
120. Belmont
176. W&M
274. VMI
160. FGCU
90. Louisiana Tech
147. Maine
226. Bucknell
262. Charlotte
273. Marist
318. Ball State
Remaining OOC:
2. Auburn
120. Belmont
176. W&M
274. VMI
160. FGCU
Low expectations, low scheduling, low ability to adapt. Low ranking.
Expected.
Sorry, but the teams to which UR lost were really bad, watching the games did nothing to show anything different. That all three are 225+ in the NET is right in line with how they played.
That UR is below them makes perfect sense.
The leafyness is beautiful this time of year though!!
Sorry, but the teams to which UR lost were really bad, watching the games did nothing to show anything different. That all three are 225+ in the NET is right in line with how they played.
That UR is below them makes perfect sense.
The leafyness is beautiful this time of year though!!
Not surprising at all. I think we are more like a 300 level team this year. We are definitely the cupcake this year.
Normally I would expect to be competitive with anyone with a fair shot of winning. Usually I'd be disappointed with a double digit loss to anyone and devastated by a 20+ point loss. This year, with this team, I EXPECT at least a 30+ point loss (and that's if Auburn is being nice). We are that bad this year.
We can probably lose to Auburn by 30 and our NET will improve next week simply because our strength of schedule will take such a jump. Top 200 here we come!
I think this will be a let down spot for Auburn, after playing at Duke. Bigger letdown spot if they win at Duke. If they lose, it could get ugly for us - but still a let down.
This is bull, we should be at least 5 spots better than Fordham…40. Dayton
57. Bona
58. Rhody
69. Loyola
72. VCU
79. Mason
114. Davidson
118. La Salle
129. GW
134. St. Joe's
228. SLU
229. UMass
256. Fordham
259. UR
326. Duquesne
NCAA Statistics
Thank goodness, John Hardt was able to get the extension signed last Spring on Mooney. I'm sure multiple BCS programs were about to beat down our door wanting to hire him out from under us. Lol. Disgraceful. And no one dare ask King Mooney about this, less he get all bristly with him and then have to obstificate about how hard everything is.
Still like this presentation, just not results..
bracketologists.com
Atlantic 10 Conference at Bracketologists
bracketologists.com
Who has fallen further - the Regular Season Champs or the Tourny Champs!?!40. Dayton
57. Bona
58. Rhody
69. Loyola
72. VCU
79. Mason
114. Davidson
118. La Salle
129. GW
134. St. Joe's
228. SLU
229. UMass
256. Fordham
259. UR
326. Duquesne
NCAA Statistics
not shocked at all40. Dayton
57. Bona
58. Rhody
69. Loyola
72. VCU
79. Mason
114. Davidson
118. La Salle
129. GW
134. St. Joe's
228. SLU
229. UMass
256. Fordham
259. UR
326. Duquesne
NCAA Statistics
Yeah. I tried to spell check it and it didn't come up. Sorry, obfuscate is the correct spelling. Mooney gives a masterclass in this any time someone asks him a tough question.
So, a coach who won an A-10 tourney title and a dance game in 22 and an A-10 regular season title in 24 should not get an extension? And, despite the numerous conference titles and success several of our sports programs have had since he got here, you feel taking yet another jab at Hardt is justified too?
He got an extension after the dance in 22. Didn't need another one in 24, especially considering we didn't even make the postseason last year and also because no one else wanted his services and was still under contract. We negotiated against only ourselves and to what ends. And had Hardt looked at Mooney's 20 year track record he would have seen a year like this year bearing down the tracks at him.
So, yeah I'm taking all of the shots at Hardt. The extension was unneeded last year and now tied ourselves further to a guy who wins 55% of the time. And since he exceeded 55% last year, you knew a reversion to the mean was coming, and boy is it coming.
So, yeah I'm taking all of the shots at Hardt. The extension was unneeded last year and now tied ourselves further to a guy who wins 55% of the time. And since he exceeded 55% last year, you knew a reversion to the mean was coming, and boy is it coming.
Hardt is actually fine. The problem is not effort at setting up successful programs. We've had a good amount of success across our sports programs. The problem is recognizing when one is failing or at least recognizing when it is not reaching potential. And then not recognizing the glaring problem! Kinda compounds the issue when it so happens to be our flagship program.
