It is by coachingThe other member of the big 3 ain’t much better. Not sure if that is by design or by ability
It is by coachingThe other member of the big 3 ain’t much better. Not sure if that is by design or by ability
We don’t have a “fantastic” “big 3.” We have two players, Gilyard and Golden, who are very good. I might accept that Gilyard is fantastic. Every other player is inconsistent, unathletic, or not talented enough to be a starter (and in some cases a contributor) on most D1 teams.1. Depth. Give credit to Mooney for recruiting the big 3. They are FANTASTIC. That is why Mooney is an average coach and not a terrible one. However, it was clear that they were tired. When Loyola’s best player Cluster was playing poorly, they brought in a player from the bench who played great. There were about 5 solid scoring options for them. Being a great coach means having depth of around 6 players who are reliable enough to score double digits on a given night. We only have 3.
Exactly. Under mooney this program has become a joke.The nation is laughing at us. The 15 tv sets that are tuned in.
Exactly! Thats why moondog kept all of the starters in near the end. “Kept it competitive.” My ass.Mooney will say they kept it under 20. Stayed competitive. Lot of positives to carry to the next game. Mooney's boss PQ will applaud the effort.
We are fans. We had hopes but the dirt always sinks to the bottom eventually and with CM at the helm it is irreversible and frustrating. Loyola felt us out the first half thats why we looked good, then like a good boxer taking on a bum, they easily found our cracks and destroyed us. CM teams are SO predictable its sickening.I love reading these in game threads post game. It’s like riding an emotional tidal wave.
We have depth problems, we knew this preseason. Our defense looked okay early and then got broken down and we didn’t adjust. This is a long dying habit. They’re a better team, most reasonable folks expected we’d lose this game.
I don’t think anything unusual transpired tonight.
Don’t get me wrong, as a fan I was bummed by what happened. I just wasn’t surprised.We are fans. We had hopes but the dirt always sinks to the bottom eventually and with CM at the helm it is irreversible and frustrating. Loyola felt us out the first half thats why we looked good, then like a good boxer taking on a bum, they easily found our cracks and destroyed us. CM teams are SO predictable its sickening.
Mooney will only beat very bad teams who are coached by similarly bad coaches. Even a bad twam with a decent coach (Longwood) will beat a CM coached team on most days. He is the most predictable coach in the land and with even the smallest amount of prep work, a decent coach will break us down easily.I am really proud of the way we played tonight for the most part. There was the best first half of richmond basketball I’ve seen in awhile. However, this game is a perfect representation as to why Mooney is only average and not a great coach.
1. Depth. Give credit to Mooney for recruiting the big 3. They are FANTASTIC. That is why Mooney is an average coach and not a terrible one. However, it was clear that they were tired. When Loyola’s best player Cluster was playing poorly, they brought in a player from the bench who played great. There were about 5 solid scoring options for them. Being a great coach means having depth of around 6 players who are reliable enough to score double digits on a given night. We only have 3.
2. Half time adjustments. Clearly they made them and we didn’t. Being able to make effective in game adjustments is what a great coach does. An average coach hopes that what they’re doing will work for 40 minutes.
3. Rebounding. I will say this 1000 times. A great coach puts an emphasis on rebounding because that’s how you score second chance points and prevent the other team from scoring second chance points. An average coach makes no effort for rebounds and hopes that a team misses shots that will land nicely for them to grab.
4. Personnel. Loyola’s coach Moser assembled a team that has a strong presence in the paint, can shoot perimeter shots if need be, drive to the basket, etc. this equips them to handle any kind of opponent and be versatile with their scoring options. Mooney recruiting lack of big men (outside of Golden) shows. A great coach recognizes the size discrepancy and adjusts the game to drive more to the basket and take more shots in the low post.
This is why Loyola is coming off a final four run and we are hoping to be .500 this year. Don’t get me wrong, Mooney isn’t a terrible coach. That is why we played well the first half and will win a decent amount of games this year. However, beating the IUPUI and St Francis of this world is not where we should strive to be. Mooney has hit his plateau of what he is capable of doing. That’s why I Hope Hardt sees through a 16-16 record where all our wins are against IUPUI, Coppin State, St Francis type teams.
Is Mooney still safe if we lose to Wyoming?
Bet the under the next game for any team that plays vs our defense.In other news, that Longwood juggernaut put up 39 points tonight. NOT IN A HALF.
In other news, that Longwood juggernaut put up 39 points tonight. NOT IN A HALF.
Anyone know where the refs were from last night? (no they did not cost us the game) I thought they called a poor game last night, they called 39 fouls in our game. But the next crew called 52 in the second game. BTW Wyoming has 2 VA players on their roster, they are 6'2" to 6'7" for those that played last night. 2 played all 40 minutes.
BTW Wyoming has 2 VA players on their roster, they are 6'2" to 6'7" for those that played last night. 2 played all 40 minutes.
Wish we would have had Jesse P last night.
They’re a better team, most reasonable folks expected we’d lose this game.
I don’t think anything unusual transpired tonight.
We have had many games over the last 5 years where it is very obvious we can not contain a quick guard off the dribble and continuously give up layup after layup in this atrocious matchup zone garbage.I'll give Loyola credit. I think they're a really good team again. we'll see.
defensively, could nobody in the 2nd half give any resistance to someone looking to drive? I think Nathan is the only guy who can stay in front of his man. not even our quick guards. you've got to slow a guy down a little or help can't help.
I have to assume we force baseline intentionally ... at least I hope so based on how easy it was to go baseline. you can argue against that strategy, but it worked ok in the 1st half as we actually rotated, cut off the drive on the ball side of the hoop, and anticipated the pass. but the 2nd half was a freaking layup line. nobody got across the lane.
I've read many times here how Mooney wrongly pulls guys out after making a mistake and they lose confidence. I personally miss that. I'm guessing he's not pulling guys now because he doesn't think the bench is ready but if Nathan takes 6 dribbles in the lane before turning it over he needs to get yanked and get the death stare as he comes off the floor. same with Woj if he throws a lazy perimeter pass that gets stolen for a dunk, Nick when he doesn't get involved defensively, JJ and Jacob when they get blown effortlessly, and Grant after he gives up an offensive rebound on a foul shot for the 3rd time in the game.
we were very poor on both ends in the 2nd half. some say we were tired. I sure hope so. we played hard early so it could be that, though the minutes weren't excessive. but turnovers killed us. they may have been an even bigger problem in the 2nd half than the defense which was really bad.
side note ... the refs were atrocious and it had a huge effect. granted, Nathan was a mess in his 12 minutes. some awful turnovers. but the fouls may have been in his head. I don't know how it's possible to even make that initial grab-and-pull call, but then to review it and stick with it? I can only guess the monitor wasn't working and they stared at a blank screen.
Loyola is a good team. it's not a shocking loss. I hope we bounce back Wednesday.
Wish we would have had Jesse P last night.
Websters says winningest = having achieved the most wins. so they weren't inaccurate.winningest means having achieved the most success. That distinction belongs to Coach Tarrant who has the highest winning percentage. Realize announcers "get carried away" particularly when they have little knowledge of a program; however, they should be accurate.
Yes, but I was looking to leverage his Simon Says skills, he could of cleaned up in the off day contests is my belief.He's not even starting for Salem University. Averaging 7ish points a game this year.