Sounds good 17, we will have a full swag bag of #FMM gear sent out, just private message 97 the details for delivery.
From reading the Wisconsin boards, it sounds like we outdrew them pretty significantly in women's basketball this year.Man, I don't know. It's a world of haves and have-nots out there. The Atlantic 10 as an *entire league* averages a top 100 recruit maybe every 3 years, and they're typically barely in the top 100. Lauren Betts was the top recruit in her class! The transfer portal, league consolidation, TV contracts, and NIL have complete changed the model of college sports.
I have to pay an extra $10 a month just to watch Richmond games. I can more easily access B1G women's soccer games then Richmond women's basketball games and I don't even live somewhere with a B1G team. There just isn't the exposure. When we do have nationally televised games the Robins Center is still only about 1/3 full, so not sure where a fanbase is either.
Don't think it's as simple as "just win."
Have to say that was some pretty sweet swag. 17, I think you will look great in it.Sounds good 17, we will have a full swag bag of #FMM gear sent out, just private message 97 the details for delivery.
Which of our incoming freshmen are likely to have a role next season?
I actually think Moon would oppose increasing women's funding and would get Queely in his camp too. Exposes Moon too much for how doable it might be for men - - and Moon wants no expectations etc.I’ve said that b4. It’s only way. If we really want to be at the big boys and girls table with basketball.
Problem is UR saying no. They say “philanthropy” and revenue (which probably means cuts) is how they fund. Is there really a lot of philanthropy coming to women’s hoops. Be nice but doubt it. Even after this great season. How much can we really do with those 2?
Those 2 things r important but I say maneuver money set up a little side fund thru endowment.
That’s where our advantage really lies but I’m skeptical of such institutional support for it. It doesn’t help to have Hardt and Mooney who won’t be drivers of change there either.
No doubt. Already outperformed the Men’s team this year. Can you imagine if it continued for multiple years? Seems like there is at least one person who wouldn’t be sad if Roussell decided to move on.I actually think Moon would oppose increasing women's funding and would get Queely in his camp too. Exposes Moon too much for how doable it might be for men - - and Moon wants no expectations etc.
If Roussell and Doogan both return next year, we are probably preseason Top 25 with a potential All American on our roster. The men's team will not be the focus during hoops season next year at UR. That is a statement I never thought I would write.I actually think Moon would oppose increasing women's funding and would get Queely in his camp too. Exposes Moon too much for how doable it might be for men - - and Moon wants no expectations etc.
From the article in the RTD this morning about Roussel, it reads as if he is coming back next year.
Article this AM, but I agree with 97 assessment, more work to be done.97 - do you have a link? The latest article I see is from yesterday. The RTD is pretty much a disorganized jumble so it might be one I somehow missed.
Sorry, I'm old school and still get the paper.Thanks for the link. I read this yesterday so the "this morning" part made me think I'd missed something.
No problem. If you had the "paperboy" I had you would have switched to digital by now.Sorry, I'm old school and still get the paper.
Would be sick!If Roussell and Doogan both return next year, we are probably preseason Top 25 with a potential All American on our roster. The men's team will not be the focus during hoops season next year at UR. That is a statement I never thought I would write.
He can be the Mark Few of women's basketball.The question is how much does Roussell want to build this program and see its ceiling vs. other P5 schools. Going along what SF said, Northwestern just because it’s in the Big10 doesn’t necessarily mean it will have a higher/significantly higher ceiling than a USC or Iowa even that it’s worth starting over for and leaving what he’s established here. The ceiling at Richmond is definitely higher than Bucknell. At Richmond, we got AP votes throughout several weeks this year, play in elite OOC tournaments and tough non-conference schedule, have a chance at at-large in multi bid conference, and advance in NCAA tournament. I don’t think Bucknell will have allowed him to reach these heights. The question is how much further can we push the envelope. I am optimistic and think we continue to reach new heights and we have not reached our Apex like Roussell said. Next year, I think we can be ranked, beat more power teams, and advance to R32 again and beyond.
There’s not as much parity in women’s basketball as there is in men’s. Realistically only a handful of like 6-7 schools will win the national championship any given year (this year the contenders are all the 1 seeds + UConn + LSU). There is a ton more to continue to build with UR and that can be enticing enough to stay here, versus at Bucknell he felt he reached the peak of what could be achieved.
I noticed that, too, EightLegger. Coach sounded ready for more too. Let's give him what he needs to grow this program. I think he wants to stay here - we just have to show him the support he needs.I liked that during the postgame press conference, Doogan was talking about Budnik and said "I don't know what I'm going to do without her next year." I interpreted that, rightly or wrongly, to mean Doogan is planning to come back. We'll see.
That’s the hope!He can be the Mark Few of women's basketball.
We would have made it to the Elite 8 this year if we were a 6 or 7 seed. Beating the highest ranked team in the nation on their home court proved to be too much but not by much.I've always considered our men's Sweet 16 appearances to be the equivalent of our Final Four. I think it is almost impossible for us to make it any further.
Same with the women, although that's even harder, because the talent in WBB is concentrated so much more among the power-conference teams. UCLA already had an outstanding program before it got some of the best players from Stanford, Washington State, Oregon State in the portal. That's what we've up against.
That said, Day of Giving is coming up and I plan on bumping up my donation to WBB.
If I were a kid being recruited, that kind of stuff would cause me to look elsewhere fast. I guess most kids might be excited about traveling all over the country, so maybe it's a selling point. But I would be miserable with that kind of travel.Big 18 coaches everywhere, especially on the West Coast, are bitching about the unreasonable travel. Let's hope they keep complaining.
The Rutgers baseball team was out here last week, playing at OSU on Tuesday and at that team down the road over the weekend. I talked to a fundraiser who accompanied them and he told me their travel schedule.
They took a redeye from JFK to PDX on Sunday night, came to Corvallis on Monday (90 minutes), played Tuesday, went down to Eugene (45 minutes) on Thursday, played Friday, Saturday and Sunday and flew home Sunday night out of PDX, just over two hours from Eugene. He thought they'd get back to campus sometime late morning/early afternoon on Monday.
That's crazy.