Two years at Norfolk State and then last year at Wright State.
So a program that’s predicated on shooting well from 3 is trying to get a guy who doesn’t shoot often or well from 3?He is a wing who doesn't shoot the three...he's only 8-for-33 in his career. Solid shooting percentage from two though (54.7% last season), so I assume he's getting to the rim quite a bit. Gets to the line a decent amount, but only 65% from the stripe. Solid rebounder for his size.
his film looks like he could play some 2 guard, needs to work on 3 pt off season.Don’t we have 3-4 wing guys already? I know, I know…positionless.
While I’m sure we can use help everywhere, please Show me some SG and F types,
2 point fg pct good. Ft pct not good. Assuming his rebounding pct bolstered somewhat by offensive rebounds which would most certainly drop if he plays in Moon offensive rebounding philosophy. Just not overly sold on him as impact player????He is a wing who doesn't shoot the three...he's only 8-for-33 in his career. Solid shooting percentage from two though (54.7% last season), so I assume he's getting to the rim quite a bit. Gets to the line a decent amount, but only 65% from the stripe. Solid rebounder for his size.
career stats show getting better at 3, film shows he can attack basket and can sky with quick leap.He is a wing who doesn't shoot the three...he's only 8-for-33 in his career. Solid shooting percentage from two though (54.7% last season), so I assume he's getting to the rim quite a bit. Gets to the line a decent amount, but only 65% from the stripe. Solid rebounder for his size.
We need wings who can freaking shoot anywhere on the courtWe need wing guys that can play.
Going from 2-for-10 in each of his first two years to 4-for-13 last year is not a statistically significant sample size to be able to say anything about his percentage trend.career stats show getting better at 3, film shows he can attack basket and can sky with quick leap.
That was role I had in mindIf we have the right guards and team around him, he could play the DJI Bailey big guard role, both weren’t high volume 3 point scorers but they put consistent pressure on the rim, athletic, good defenders and just high energy players. This years team lacked athleticism and dudes that hustle and play defense. Honestly I wouldn’t mind this commitment at all.
2x as many makes. Sounds good enough for meGoing from 2-for-10 in each of his first two years to 4-for-13 last year is not a statistically significant sample size to be able to say anything about his percentage trend.
And his rate of taking threes is decreasing...one attempt per 23.2 minutes as a frosh, one per 31 minutes as a sophomore, and one per 59.2 minutes as a junior.
Well right now, we don't have the "right guards" nor team around him. We have 2 open slots for the portal at present (hoping for more) and we have absolutely no one on the roster that is an alpha or frankly other teams even have to game plan around. We have a whole team of guys who are 7th and 8th bench players, so we can't be using our 2 portal spots for more of the same. Hard pass.If we have the right guards and team around him, he could play the DJI Bailey big guard role, both weren’t high volume 3 point scorers but they put consistent pressure on the rim, athletic, good defenders and just high energy players. This years team lacked athleticism and dudes that hustle and play defense. Honestly I wouldn’t mind this commitment at all.
Would be nice, but it seems like that would be a lateral move, similar small school in the same conference. Feel like Durkin had some big school offers coming out? Pretty sure he will be going big conference exposure and NIL$.Go after Bob Durkin who is available
we don't seem to recruit for our system, yet don't alter the system to the players we recruit.So a program that’s predicated on shooting well from 3 is trying to get a guy who doesn’t shoot often or well from 3?
Wtf is happening. I guess I’m gonna need to start drinking more heavily.
Yep, its an odd thing. Take last year, Tied for only conference reg season A10 under Mooney, and though we did have shooters - I think it was more predicated on having tough, athletic, defensive minded players. So totally scrapped that notion in portal, going for "best shooting team ever", and landed near the bottom with preferred Mooney type players. Indeed, make it make sense! I think the underlying theme is that Mooney has no clue how to "compete" in this environment. And all the messaging says "let's give it a couple more years to figure it out" Sensible.we don't seem to recruit for our system, yet don't alter the system to the players we recruit.
make it make sense.
Transfers only or transfers plus increase in roster size? If it’s the latter we have 4 open now because there will be 2 going from 13 to 15 scholarship and GW3 & Weaver are in the portal.I have heard they expect 4 openings,
That what I was thinking, I thought we had 4 roster spots open