It's George. Yes, that one - not the other one.
- Thread starter ChoppinBroccoli
- Start date
We got this, Nick gets back on track, Spiders win by double digits
Im watching on a computer, because game is not on a tv... where i am anyway.If it is not on TV then how do you know he is running around.
What the hell was that from Golden on defense... backs up as the guy nears the basket and he lets the guy get a layup.
Why when they reverse a foul is it always an intentional or tech that gives two shots and the ball?
Yes it was a foul on Burton. I saw that live. And you made the wrong call but why are you double penalizing the Spiders?
It was a basic foul. Just because you are a terrible ref doesn’t mean you need to give extra to the other team.
Yes it was a foul on Burton. I saw that live. And you made the wrong call but why are you double penalizing the Spiders?
It was a basic foul. Just because you are a terrible ref doesn’t mean you need to give extra to the other team.
Burton is so active. He’s always around the ball. He will be a deadly 3 point shooter as his career goes on.
Why?
It looked like a common foul on Burton. Which is ball to GW. Not two shots and the ball.
They seem to always call the flagrant only when they screw up and reverse it.
The original call was a foul on GW and they reversed it when they went to the review.
It looked like a common foul on Burton. Which is ball to GW. Not two shots and the ball.
They seem to always call the flagrant only when they screw up and reverse it.
The original call was a foul on GW and they reversed it when they went to the review.
And yet GW has beaten our next 3 opponent. Just goes to show not all games are the same.
Watching this on ESPN +. Most biases and clueless announcer I’ve heard in a while
They called a common foul on GW and then went to review it.
Initial call was a common foul on GW. Then they reversed that foul (ref said right to the radio guys “take the foul off white and and give a hook and hold to red”).
The hook and hold on Burton is a flagrant. There was a hold but no hook. The hook and hold call was put in place to protect the player from injury.
It was a bad missed call on Burton who did hold the arm. But an even worse over-call on the flagrant on Burton.
It’s been a common thing this year in college b-ball now that the refs can review potential flagrants (hook and holds, elbows above the shoulder). They make the wrong call and then not only reverse it but they over react.
Initial call was a common foul on GW. Then they reversed that foul (ref said right to the radio guys “take the foul off white and and give a hook and hold to red”).
The hook and hold on Burton is a flagrant. There was a hold but no hook. The hook and hold call was put in place to protect the player from injury.
It was a bad missed call on Burton who did hold the arm. But an even worse over-call on the flagrant on Burton.
It’s been a common thing this year in college b-ball now that the refs can review potential flagrants (hook and holds, elbows above the shoulder). They make the wrong call and then not only reverse it but they over react.
I honestly don't care how we look at this point. We need to win, we did. ALL THAT MATTERS.
The announcers suggested that the only way they can justify their taking a look at the foul and changing it is if they call it a blatant. So I suppose there may be a self-justification factor at work.
I don't know, I guess the "eye test" doesn't matter but that was ugly to watch. I suppose it looks the same on the sheet selection Sunday. But darn, we looked dead and GW the same.
Its hard to say that. I agree but that two poor performances in a row and one was a lose. Yes great we won but wont win many playing that bad.
Similar threads
