ADVERTISEMENT

Can money truly buy you happiness in the form of a collegiate sports team?

Anachnid

Letter Winner
Dec 31, 2021
370
501
63
Uva received $13 million from two donors to buy football players. Results to be seen.
And this leads to the question how much money leads to the intended result?
The question then needed to be asked of our own men’s basketball situation is how much money was spent for this mess?
At some point and not really here but in big monied programs failure is going to fall on the well paid players and
my personal belief is it could get ugly.
 
Duke just spent $8M for the Tulane quarterback. Impressive, but I'm not sure it will get them to the playoffs. Seems like basketball should be the easiest sport to make a major impact with a few well-placed signings, but ultimately every fan base but one is going to be disappointed with the end results.
 
Duke just spent $8M for the Tulane quarterback. Impressive, but I'm not sure it will get them to the playoffs. Seems like basketball should be the easiest sport to make a major impact with a few well-placed signings, but ultimately every fan base but one is going to be disappointed with the end results.
I thought the same thing, but Duke spending 8 mil on a QB is counter to that thought -definitely not a championship winning investment. A fool and his money soon part is the only thing that comes to mind.
 
Ask Phil Knight. He purchased an entire athletic department.

I expect UVa would get more long-term bang for their bucks had those boosters donated to program enhancement or facilities upgrades, rather than what are essentially salaries that must be paid again and again.

Other's mileage may vary (OMMV), but I will never donate to an NIL program, at UR or anywhere. I will donate to funding drives for new or improved facilities, or endowed scholarships, or the like; they are forever and do not transfer at the drop of a hat.
 
Accountability will hopefully be an increased part of our basketball program as NIL money is strictly in place to win games as the academic piece is covered with the scholarship that is provided by the university.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eight Legger
I'm hating this Win at all cost attitude. I guess DIII is the only true amateur football/basketball left.
 
Thanks gkiler, was going to point out that an a10 regular season tie every 20 years is really a roll of the dice, almost would have to try not to hire a coach that could do that. But Annap knows this, he is just trolling.
It's about the timing though, 23. A regular season title and a tourney title with an NCAA tourney win 2 of the last 3 seasons will get you some extra years. Along with the 24 win season in 2020, no A-10 school would not want a coach that has done that 3 of the past 5 seasons. I am as frustrated as anyone with our roster this year, but that doesn't mean we should just forget about all the success the past 5 seasons, and act like it didn't happen.
 
Getting a little off track from the point of this specific thread, but I think the big picture is whether we have the things in place that are needed to produce teams that win in a sustainable way at a high level year after year or not. And by saying that, I'm referring to the Dayton/vcu level of expectation of legitimately having a chance to win the A10 every single year.

It's clear to me that our administration and our top donors do not have that level of expectation. In 20 years, what we've seen is that we require an exceptional point guard in order to win anything of significance, and sometimes even when we have one, we still don't do that.We've also seen that we almost never are successful with players who have little or no experience in this system and/or playing together.

This makes it difficult to be a sustainable winner, IMO, especially in this NIL environment. So I think it's fair to ask whether this system and this approach is likely to suddenly change and produce the consistent winning we all want, or whether another approach would be more likely to produce that.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT