Live by the Francis, die by the Francis
Only Blake and Tyler were asserting themselves at the offensive end.35% of our shots. Man. That’s far too much.
Too bad we didn't play the whole game with the urgency we played the last 2 minutes with.
Only Blake and Tyler were asserting themselves at the offensive end.
What happened to Nathan and Nick? ESPN doesn’t have the minutes distribution up yet.
Me thinks that Schmidt outcoached us for 30 minutes.We had no answers.It’s not the 1st Time he’s done that.They had a week to prepare.Nice.
You get home games (maybe) with the NIT.Nothing has changed, RICHMOND STILL HAS TO WIN THE CONFERENCE TOURNAMENT TO GET INTO THE NCAA. Can we please join a league where we have a good shot at winning the conference tournament every year? Because we sure as hell have zero chance of ever getting an at-large bid with Mooney.
But then I'm just too excited about the NIT!
Sorry, but most of our three point attempts were uncontested. BTW Last home game was a 29 point home loss.Nick was off from outside, and they will taking our inside game away. We needed to shoot well from outside, and we didn't. Sometimes, you have to credit the other team. They played well tonight. They have good players just like we do. And, when we rallied at the end, they made their FTs like good teams do.
If we’d have won out and taken a couple in the A10 tourney I believe we would have gotten an at large. Certainly that is virtually dead nowNothing has changed, RICHMOND STILL HAS TO WIN THE CONFERENCE TOURNAMENT TO GET INTO THE NCAA. Can we please join a league where we have a good shot at winning the conference tournament every year? Because we sure as hell have zero chance of ever getting an at-large bid with Mooney.
But then I'm just too excited about the NIT!
Hey when you have open 3s and you suppose to have good shooters and miss, it
is called “not your night”. There were also some ticky tac calls at bad times. I agree
it would be nice to have a 6’4 Gonzo guard. This team though did not give up and
that is the sign of a good team who just had a bad shooting night.
Nick was off from outside, and they will taking our inside game away. We needed to shoot well from outside, and we didn't. Sometimes, you have to credit the other team. They played well tonight. They have good players just like we do. And, when we rallied at the end, they made their FTs like good teams do.
Wheel of Excuses:
- Refs
- Olean is cold
- Bus ride
- They had a bye week
- Unfair admissions policies
- Malcolm Bernard
- Bill Lanier
- They had a bye week
- Keith Gill
- No Bojangles in Olean
Well said. We had plenty of good looks. And, I thought we made some good adjustments in the 2nd half, and had even better looks, but still could not make enough. We were feeding Grant, they doubled, and we started passing the ball around the perimeter quickly, and making an extra pass to an open guy. Not much you can do when the shots are not falling. You have to keep shooting them. And, I had no issue at all with Blake taking 20 some shots. Most were good ones, and if anyone is going to shoot us back from a double digit deficit, it's Blake. We are 20-7 overall and tied for 3rd at 10-4 IC. And, we still have a good chance to dance. I think we all would take that at the beginning of the year.
Have to add a Jim KellyWheel of Excuses:
- Refs
- Olean is cold
- Bus ride
- They had a bye week
- Unfair admissions policies
- Malcolm Bernard
- Bill Lanier
- They had a bye week
- Keith Gill
- No Bojangles in Olean
Well said......We had plenty of good looks.
We disagree about ‘good looks’. Most of them were forced/rushed to get over the defender or from 5 feet behind the 3 point line.
We only get two bids in our league
Waited too long to make adjustments
Need Sherod to contribute more list goes on..
I didn’t get to see the game at all, or hear it. By looking at the final stat line, if we have Blake shooting 22 shots and scoring 23 points, we aren’t going to win. It’s a recipe for disaster to only have one guy chucking up all the shots.
To me this was the only remaining regular season game we could afford to lose (road, quad 2 game). Still gives us a chance to reel off the last 4 and end the season on a hot streak.
But man it hurts anyway. We have a tourney caliber team. These are the games we need to find a way to win.
announcer made the comment several times he did not like our shooting form -- we were not completing our shots before we were heading down the floor for D, sort of like the golf shot with no follow through
Has Mooney ever beaten Bonnies on the road?
So my post 152 would be decided by who beat #5,#6,#7...Good time to visit this thread. Tiebreakers are listed
https://www.basketballforum.com/threads/if-the-a10-tournament-started-today-2020-edition.686248/
Duquesne has a better NET than Bona. We needed to win this one. We could afford to lose that one.To me this was the only remaining regular season game we could afford to lose (road, quad 2 game). Still gives us a chance to reel off the last 4 and end the season on a hot streak.
But man it hurts anyway. We have a tourney caliber team. These are the games we need to find a way to win.
But if they all got to 14-4 by URI losing to Dayton, and the other two winning out...URI still gets a crack at Dayton. If that’s a win, I think they would get the tiebreaker by virtue of win over highest ranking common opponent
I honestly do not know how much it gets affected, but Duquesne lose today and if they lose to UR in final game, along with Bona win over UR today could reverse the NET, maybe? far more a question than a statement on my part, does anyone know?Duquesne has a better NET than Bona. We needed to win this one. We could afford to lose that one.
Duquesne has a better NET than Bona. We needed to win this one. We could afford to lose that one.