I have to give props to CM and the staff, they had a good backup plan for AW. Aleem is a solid player, lets get it done this weekend
different players. Ford and Hazen are longer, and we're really looking for a bigger forward. these two are a legit 6'7". but let's not downplay Wesson because he didn't come here. he's the best ball handler and passer of the 3, and supposedly known for his defense. Wesson's really good, and would have been an awesome addition to this team.IMHO, both Aleem and Brachen are as good or better than Wesson. Let's corral both of them! OSC
I believe Both hazen and ford project more as PFs than Wesson so that's one advantage to either.different players. Ford and Hazen are longer, and we're really looking for a bigger forward. these two are a legit 6'7". but let's not downplay Wesson because he didn't come here. he's the best ball handler and passer of the 3, and supposedly known for his defense. Wesson's really good, and would have been an awesome addition to this team.
but he's gone. there's a great spot available to Ford or Hazen. room for both but I doubt that would happen. 1st who wants it gets it.
I had stated elsewhere that I thought aleem projected as a 4 for us, but looks like a 3 or stretch 4. Nice outside shot but has a midrange game and good at the rim too.Hope springs eternal. Probably posted before, but worth watching again; love Aleem! OSC
Homer, Aleem has a much better handle and is clearly a much better shooter than Deion. The only similarity the Ulla sees is both "can jump out of the gym". Would love for Aleem to choose to become a Spider. OSCWhether you see it as a positive or a negative is up to you, BUT, his game looks very similar to Deion Taylor.
Yeah, I don't agree. Obviously it's hard to tell when evaluating high school tape versus what a guy projects at the college level, but Aleem is a lot more fluid and strong with the ball than I think Deion ever was. Is there something specific you are seeing?Whether you see it as a positive or a negative is up to you, BUT, his game looks very similar to Deion Taylor.
Eight, not sure if you looked at that video, but he was hitting shots on tape from all over. Lots of mid-range and also getting to the basket. Not much post-play in there, which is why I re-thought my feeling that he was a 4, I really think he's a 3, maybe stretch 4. As noted by sman, we are likely to end up with two guys who are SFs instead of having a true PF anyway though.My concern is that he seems like the type of wing who will just float to the three-point line and settle for long jumpers. I don't see a ton of uber-aggressiveness in him, the way I did with Wesson. Maybe I just haven't seen the right clips yet, but my concern with this type of player is that he will become soft the way many before them have become in our system. I'd prefer we find guys with lots of fire and aggression, like Buck.
Eight, not sure if you looked at that video, but he was hitting shots on tape from all over. Lots of mid-range and also getting to the basket. Not much post-play in there, which is why I re-thought my feeling that he was a 4, I really think he's a 3, maybe stretch 4. As noted by sman, we are likely to end up with two guys who are SFs instead of having a true PF anyway though.
Understood, I never put a lot of faith in someone's "prettiest pictures" video. They are intentionally designed to make one look awesome. So yes, you have to take it with a grain of salt. I guess the positive takeaway is that he can at least those mid-range jumpers which some of our starters had serious trouble with last year.Yeah, I watched it. I'm just projecting based on what I've seen of him. Hard to really place a lot of faith in the defenses he was facing in those clips. I don't think he had to work too hard to get his shots.
Hoping that my impression of him is just the result of him being SO smooth that it looks like he's not exerting a ton of effort. At least he has some decent offers, and at this point I doubt we can do a lot better unless we get Hazen.
the weather???
Understood, I never put a lot of faith in someone's "prettiest pictures" video. They are intentionally designed to make one look awesome. So yes, you have to take it with a grain of salt. I guess the positive takeaway is that he can at least those mid-range jumpers which some of our starters had serious trouble with last year.
Bradenton high 82F projected, a bit hot; Richmond high 72F, ideal! OSCthe weather???
that might help if he was from Boston. Aleem is coming up from Bradenton FL!
Heck he can play as a 3 and a Tightend in football if he wants.In the article on Spiderhoops.com, Aleem said that he saw himself more as a 3.
Those are fighting words!! LolWhether you see it as a positive or a negative is up to you, BUT, his game looks very similar to Deion Taylor.
What would the foul line be considered? Just wondering.As a team we were actually one of the best in the country at mid-range jump shots. We averaged over 40% from mid-range, 36th best in the country. The average mid-range shooting percentage is ~36%, our starters were: Deion 69%, TJC 45%, SDJ 42%, TA 39%, TD 30%, so Trey was the only starter who was below average. Our other players were: Wood 35%, KF 34%, JJ 25%, JP 0%, PF 100%.
Do you have the raw numbers for TD and DT vs the other 3 starters? I didn't say we were a bad mid-range team, I just don't think it was a meaningful part of either of TD/DT's game, I suspect raw numbers would prove that out better than the percentages. I could be wrong.As a team we were actually one of the best in the country at mid-range jump shots. We averaged over 40% from mid-range, 36th best in the country. The average mid-range shooting percentage is ~36%, our starters were: Deion 69%, TJC 45%, SDJ 42%, TA 39%, TD 30%, so Trey was the only starter who was below average. Our other players were: Wood 35%, KF 34%, JJ 25%, JP 0%, PF 100%.
Do you have the raw numbers for TD and DT vs the other 3 starters? I didn't say we were a bad mid-range team, I just don't think it was a meaningful part of either of TD/DT's game, I suspect raw numbers would prove that out better than the percentages. I could be wrong.
Wow, Jesse was the worst mid-range shooter in America last year? Now I see why he never played.As a team we were actually one of the best in the country at mid-range jump shots. We averaged over 40% from mid-range, 36th best in the country. The average mid-range shooting percentage is ~36%, our starters were: Deion 69%, TJC 45%, SDJ 42%, TA 39%, TD 30%, so Trey was the only starter who was below average. Our other players were: Wood 35%, KF 34%, JJ 25%, JP 0%, PF 100%.
Don't think I ever saw DT take a mid range shot in the RC much less make one. 4 out of 10 from the free throw line unguarded.
Thanks for the stats, definitely interesting/helpful. I'd stick by my earlier opinion on the midrange game based on Deion's small sample and treys pctg. I like that aleem seems comfortable shooting from a lot of spots.Haha, he only took a mid range shot once every 3 games, they were pretty rare. He also took less than one free throw a game, those were rare too.
If anyone is interested in dissecting the stats themselves they are right here: http://hoop-math.com/Richmond2016.php
Taylor's film (when he signed with Richmond) reminds me very much of Aleem Ford. Build is not that much different, athleticism is similar, they even move the same way. Deion's highlights showed him swishing several threes and making dunks (like most do). I do not see the "shooter" footwork, form, or stroke in Ford that you do with someone like Sherod. No implication that he is a bad player, but I do not see him anywhere near Wesson or Hazen.Yeah, I don't agree. Obviously it's hard to tell when evaluating high school tape versus what a guy projects at the college level, but Aleem is a lot more fluid and strong with the ball than I think Deion ever was. Is there something specific you are seeing?