ADVERTISEMENT

Preseason games?

Well aren’t the scrimmages suppose to be secret? Maybe this year they actually are…
 
  • Like
Reactions: urfan1
Correct, we always do scrimmages instead of public exhibitions, and they can't be publicized.

I'm sure Goodman will publish his list of the secret scrimmages at some point.
 
We are secret-scrimmaging Hawaii and Alaska-Anchorage. But you didn't hear it from me.
 
we had a full-fledged exhibition game a couple times in the past ten years or so, not sure why it is used so sparingly while others always have 1 and even sometimes 2 (!!)
Because our coaches believe there is more value in scrimmaging other D-I teams like VT and JMU than playing exhibitions against overmatched D-III teams.
 
Because our coaches believe there is more value in scrimmaging other D-I teams like VT and JMU than playing exhibitions against overmatched D-III teams.
Is it only D-I teams that are banned In exhibitions? Bring on the Wizards!

Or are we playing Nova in a scrimmage?
 
Exhibitions can only be against four-year collegiate institutions that are not D-I....so D-II, D-III, NAIA, etc.

You are allowed a total of two scrimmages and/or exhibitions in whatever combination you like.
 
  • Like
Reactions: urfan1
Yeah there have been some exceptions for charity in recent years, so that's a potential route we could look at. I don't know the process for applying/qualifying for that. Originally it was for major causes like hurricane relief efforts and stuff, but they seem to have broadened them the past year or two. WVU/Mason one is in support of WVU's children's hospital.
 
  • Like
Reactions: spiderman
Exhibitions can only be against four-year collegiate institutions that are not D-I....so D-II, D-III, NAIA, etc.

You are allowed a total of two scrimmages and/or exhibitions in whatever combination you like.
So, no more traveling teams like "Athletes in Action"? That's a shame, but I certainly haven't seen them on schedules for a while...
 
So, no more traveling teams like "Athletes in Action"? That's a shame, but I certainly haven't seen them on schedules for a while...
That ended in 2004.

 
weird because I remember AIA coming to the RC in the early / mid-90s and getting totally killed, so assumed they were never a competitive opponent. They had 1 guy who was good and a bunch of guys who had lost more than a step.

Also, F Rusty LaRue.
 
I have always said we should do an exhibition game - Randolph Macon I think would be a good fit as it would likely produce a decent crowd in the Robins Center with both teams being local. Kinda like VCU used to play Virginia Union each year - I think our counter would be Macon. And Macon is top tier DIII program, so while we should win the game easily, they should give us some resistance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8legs1dream
  • Love
Reactions: 8legs1dream
Are we still litigating 2019 record? SMH!
no, just noting we barely beat a DIII team in an exhibition with a very good Richmond team.
if we barely beat a DIII team in an exhibition this year, this board would implode.
maybe it did in 2019 too. but it wasn't a predictor to a bad season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VT4700
Are we still litigating 2019 record? SMH!
Really not much else you can say when talking about the 19-20 season. Without a conference tourney or post season anywhere, 24-7 is the best way to remember such an amazing season. I think it's one of our best regular seasons ever, yet some people on here want to forget about it and act like it never happened.
 
Last edited:
using winning pct is actually #3 --- 19-20=.774. 10-11 or 29-8 - .784. Best 87-88, 26-7 for .788.
 
using winning pct is actually #3 --- 19-20=.774. 10-11 or 29-8 - .784. Best 87-88, 26-7 for .788.
I said regular season, which is appropriate since we had no post season that year. I guess you are also trying to down play 2020.
 
no trying to be realistic and I prefer to evaluate an entire season. But regular season 20-21 was good but not a banner year, the shortened regular season was only .609 and in conference was a mere .545.
 
no trying to be realistic and I prefer to evaluate an entire season. But regular season 20-21 was good but not a banner year, the shortened regular season was only .609 and in conference was a mere .545.
???? Read my post again. You are going all over the place. And, 24-7 was our entire season in 2020. I could not have been more clear, yet you chose to mistakenly reply with "actually......".
 
Last edited:
2019–20 is tied with 2009–10 and 2010–11 as our 8th best regular season winning percentage.

Best regular season records:

1934–35: 20–0 (1.000)
1985–86: 21–5 (.815)
1937–38: 15–4 (.789)
2000–01: 21–6 (.778)
1991–92: 21–6 (.778)
1987–88: 21–6 (.778)
1926–27: 14–4 (.778)
2019–20: 24–7 (.774)
2010–11: 24–7 (.774)
2009–10: 24–7 (.774)
1952–53: 20–6 (.769)
1931–32: 10–3 (.769)
1924–25: 13–4 (.765)
1953–54: 21–7 (.750)
 
  • Like
Reactions: VT4700
2019–20 is tied with 2009–10 and 2010–11 as our 8th best regular season winning percentage.

Best regular season records:

1934–35: 20–0 (1.000)
1985–86: 21–5 (.815)
1937–38: 15–4 (.789)
2000–01: 21–6 (.778)
1991–92: 21–6 (.778)
1987–88: 21–6 (.778)
1926–27: 14–4 (.778)
2019–20: 24–7 (.774)
2010–11: 24–7 (.774)
2009–10: 24–7 (.774)
1952–53: 20–6 (.769)
1931–32: 10–3 (.769)
1924–25: 13–4 (.765)
1953–54: 21–7 (.750)
Cool. Good info, so 24-7 in 2020 is one of our best regular seasons ever (all opinion on what the best one was anyway), but you can count on some people on here continuing to downplay it, and I guess now you can count on fan1 for some reason to bring up the post season to compare with 2020 when we didn't even have a post season that year. Strange, but whatever.
 
Last edited:
I never said 24-7 was not a good season, if you think I did please link the post. I don't even think I brought up post season although that should be the goal every season. My reference was the same as SF, WL %, only my reference source only went back limited years, he went back a longer period and included more seasons. So my comment was somewhat in agreement with your original statement that 24-7 was "one of our better regular seasons", I pointed out it was actually #3, pretty good in my mind, but you decided I was disagreeing with you trying to down play 24-7. WHY?
 
I never said 24-7 was not a good season, if you think I did please link the post. I don't even think I brought up post season although that should be the goal every season. My reference was the same as SF, WL %, only my reference source only went back limited years, he went back a longer period and included more seasons. So my comment was somewhat in agreement with your original statement that 24-7 was "one of our better regular seasons", I pointed out it was actually #3, pretty good in my mind, but you decided I was disagreeing with you trying to down play 24-7. WHY?
Because you used the word actually, you used post season to compare when I said regular season, and all you said when replying to my initial post was this:

"using winning pct is actually #3 --- 19-20=.774. 10-11 or 29-8 - .784. Best 87-88, 26-7 for .788."

That sure seems like a post designed to disagree and downplay 2020. Even with this latest post, you still think it's fine to use post season games to come up with a record when discussing regular season records. It would be like if I said the 49ers have the best record in the NFL at 4-0, and you said, "actually Georgia and Michigan are 5-0". You aren't comparing the same thing I mentioned. But, no worries, all good on my end and we can let it go.
 
Last edited:
I never said 24-7 was not a good season, if you think I did please link the post. I don't even think I brought up post season although that should be the goal every season. My reference was the same as SF, WL %, only my reference source only went back limited years, he went back a longer period and included more seasons. So my comment was somewhat in agreement with your original statement that 24-7 was "one of our better regular seasons", I pointed out it was actually #3, pretty good in my mind, but you decided I was disagreeing with you trying to down play 24-7. WHY?

because the guy lives to argue
 
  • Like
Reactions: Not-A-Homer
Back to the point - I think a game with Macon, or maybe Mooney brings in the DIII school I think he used to coach at - Beaver College - would be worth it. I still like the secret scrimmage - cause you get a better opponent. But I think doing both would be helpful.

I am not worried about the result as much, although a loss would be surprising. But I think its just good for the kids, good for the fans - and with a school like Macon - should get a good crowd.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VT4700
2019–20 is tied with 2009–10 and 2010–11 as our 8th best regular season winning percentage.

Best regular season records:

1934–35: 20–0 (1.000)
1985–86: 21–5 (.815)
1937–38: 15–4 (.789)
2000–01: 21–6 (.778)
1991–92: 21–6 (.778)
1987–88: 21–6 (.778)
1926–27: 14–4 (.778)
2019–20: 24–7 (.774)
2010–11: 24–7 (.774)
2009–10: 24–7 (.774)
1952–53: 20–6 (.769)
1931–32: 10–3 (.769)
1924–25: 13–4 (.765)
1953–54: 21–7 (.750)
I thought we played 27 regular season game in 1985-86? Was one not D1?
 
I thought we played 27 regular season game in 1985-86? Was one not D1?
Yeah, that was a typo on the record part..oops. Should have been 22–5. I had the winning percentage correct though!
 
Really not much else you can say when talking about the 19-20 season. Without a conference tourney or post season anywhere, 24-7 is the best way to remember such an amazing season. I think it's one of our best regular seasons ever, yet some people on here want to forget about it and act like it never happened.
Without counting seasons before UR ever went to a postseason, I would say 85-86 was our best regular season team. 20-3 before losing a starter, and the 3 losses were to #6,#16,#20 AP.

The next 6 were all similar strength to each other 87-88, 91-92 (almost a forgotten team), and 2000-01 in the 27 game era.

And Mooney’s 3 in the 31 game era, 2009-10, 2010-11, 2019-20.

I don’t think 2021-22 was as good of a team as 2019-2020.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VT4700
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT