"They" UVA? Or "They" 320 teams?Did they actually refuse to play Richmond, or is that just an assumption?
I believe UVA is an assumption.
The 320 was facetious, based on Mooney claiming he "called everybody" for a game.
"They" UVA? Or "They" 320 teams?Did they actually refuse to play Richmond, or is that just an assumption?
They didn’t play Richmond, therefore by Gallipoli logic they refused...Did they actually refuse to play Richmond, or is that just an assumption?
Neither Tech nor UVA will play UR. By the way, UVA is still overratedThey didn’t play Richmond......
But rated higher than Richmond.Neither Tech nor UVA will play UR. By the way, UVA is still overrated
UVa was overrated this year. So was the entire ACC. The Pac-12 was dissed by everyone as being a cut below and is now 6-0 in the tournament despite not having anyone seeded higher than 5th.
Bennett is a an outstanding coach and I'd love to have him at UR, but let's be honest, without a missed double-dribble call Texas Tech wins the title. And he's also the only coach of a No. 1 seed to lose a 1-16 game (by 20 points, I might add). He has a long list of head-scratching losses, like last night. Ohio took 5th place in the MAC.
All coaches have flaws. But Dick Tarrant, not Tony Bennett, is the best coach in the commonwealth in the last 40 years.
Tarrant and Beilein are great - our history is incredible. Yes the ACC/UVA down this season, but Tony Bennett has a national championship, 2 other elite 8 appearances, won the ACC regular season 5 of last 8 years and won 2 ACC tourneys in same span - and you think another coach in our Commonwealth can compare to that? Laughable dude
Yes absolutely. The job Tarrant did with his recruits is miles above what Bennet has done with his elite recruits. Tarrant could win as a 15 seed. Bennett has trouble beating a 16 seed. And a 13 seed.
What about all the “great” coaches who never played a 16 seed?To me it’s simple. If you lose to a 16 seed you can never be considered a great coach. Just can’t. I know others don’t use that metric, but for me a great coach would NEVER lose that game. And that’s because no great coach has ever lost that game
Narrow minded.To me it’s simple. If you lose to a 16 seed you can never be considered a great coach. Just can’t. I know others don’t use that metric, but for me a great coach would NEVER lose that game. And that’s because no great coach has ever lost that game
Yes they are but we were ranked and didn’t make the tournament.....so you including us in that evaluation?UVA is still overrated.
What about all the “great” coaches who never played a 16 seed?
I’d question that. UVA had a lot of success nationally, Sampson, Stith, even the ivaroni team that won the Acc tourney they had some national history. Before Tarrant we were a nobodyI will always give Tarrant his due. He is our best coach and his wins in the NCAA tourney are a source of great pride. I loved telling my kids this weekend that UR was the first 2 seed to beat a 15 after ORU beat tO$U.
But there is no comparison here. Bennett rebuilt a dead ACC program with his bare hands - just like Tarrant would do - and has sustained success against UNC, Duke and the rest of the ACC. We can cherry pick losses all we want - but it’s incredible what Bennett has built at UVA. It’s certainly ok for me to admit - as a spider alum - that Tarrant is not the best coach in the state over past 40 years
Apparently, we have returned.I’d question that. UVA had a lot of success nationally, Sampson, Stith, even the ivaroni team that won the Acc tourney they had some national history. Before Tarrant we were a nobody
To me it’s simple. If you lose to a 16 seed you can never be considered a great coach. Just can’t. I know others don’t use that metric, but for me a great coach would NEVER lose that game. And that’s because no great coach has ever lost that game
Curious if u think Boeheim is a great coach. Hall of Famer. But he was 1st coach to ever lose as a 2 seed. To our Spiders of course. But u could have easily extended this “simple” rule to 1 and 2 seeds at that point in time too. It had never happened. There is always a first.
Tarrant lost his fair share of games to teams that would not have been any better than a 16 seed.
You think Tony Bennett wins those NCAA games that Tarrant won, with Tarrant's team? I don't.I will always give Tarrant his due. He is our best coach and his wins in the NCAA tourney are a source of great pride. I loved telling my kids this weekend that UR was the first 2 seed to beat a 15 after ORU beat tO$U.
But there is no comparison here. Bennett rebuilt a dead ACC program with his bare hands - just like Tarrant would do - and has sustained success against UNC, Duke and the rest of the ACC. We can cherry pick losses all we want - but it’s incredible what Bennett has built at UVA. It’s certainly ok for me to admit - as a spider alum - that Tarrant is not the best coach in the state over past 40 years
Sampson would have never played a college game today.I’d question that. UVA had a lot of success nationally, Sampson, Stith, even the ivaroni team that won the Acc tourney they had some national history. Before Tarrant we were a nobody
You think Tony Bennett wins those NCAA games that Tarrant won, with Tarrant's team? I don't.