See 34 post. Hand smacked as should have been.Talk to Fan1, I was responding to his post...
See 34 post. Hand smacked as should have been.Talk to Fan1, I was responding to his post...
Money is ruining college sports.Well - to get it back on track.
If VCU has stated they will need an extra $4-5 million per year to pay their athletes - and they don't have football - wouldn't it be safe to assume that UR would need more than that to at the very least keep up? I mean - assume UR pays 80 football players - at avg. 50K a player - that alone is $4 million just there.
And if that is the case - lets say UR needs $7-8 million, do you see them doing that?
And what is the amount you need to pay basketball, our flagship sport - to stay or at least compete on top of the A10. VCU is suggesting 300K average per basketball player. Is that the starting point?
Agree - I would say forget college and start following your local HS team, but NIL is even entering that world in some states. And as soon as 1 state goes with it, the rest will feel they have to follow to keep up.Money is ruining college sports.
Well - to get it back on track.
If VCU has stated they will need an extra $4-5 million per year to pay their athletes - and they don't have football - wouldn't it be safe to assume that UR would need more than that to at the very least keep up? I mean - assume UR pays 80 football players - at avg. 50K a player - that alone is $4 million just there.
And if that is the case - lets say UR needs $7-8 million, do you see them doing that?
And what is the amount you need to pay basketball, our flagship sport - to stay or at least compete on top of the A10. VCU is suggesting 300K average per basketball player. Is that the starting point?
I hope a meaningful portion goes to women’s hoops too. I really do think we have an opportunity to be a consistent top 40 program and top mid major program in the country under Roussell.This is going to be for mens hoops primarily just like at VCU.
So, perhaps our move to the Patriot League for football was more of a response to this than anything else. Assuming that Patriot League schools will be not be as keen on paying its players as some other conferences.Well - to get it back on track.
If VCU has stated they will need an extra $4-5 million per year to pay their athletes - and they don't have football - wouldn't it be safe to assume that UR would need more than that to at the very least keep up? I mean - assume UR pays 80 football players - at avg. 50K a player - that alone is $4 million just there.
And if that is the case - lets say UR needs $7-8 million, do you see them doing that?
And what is the amount you need to pay basketball, our flagship sport - to stay or at least compete on top of the A10. VCU is suggesting 300K average per basketball player. Is that the starting point?
Or UR decides they want no part of this or that they don't want to try and keep up with everyone else and moves everything to the Patriot League.So, perhaps our move to the Patriot League for football was more of a response to this than anything else. Assuming that Patriot League schools will be not be as keen on paying its players as some other conferences.
So, maybe we bastardize our football program so we can devote more of our player money to our flagship sports. That is of course sad, but also makes sense on a number of levels.
Well, they just said that is not their intention. They are paying to play just like the rest who want to compete. The football program was our sacrificial lamb so we could more fully "compete" in MBB.Or UR decides they want no part of this or that they don't want to try and keep up with everyone else and moves everything to the Patriot League.
So how much do we need to compete on the basketball side. If VCU is top of the league and they expect to average 300K per player (that is average, so some will be higher and some lower) - which comes out to about $3 million per year just for basketball if you only pay 10 players - do we really think UR wants to spend millions on paying basketball players?Well, they just said that is not their intention. They are paying to play just like the rest who want to compete. The football program was our sacrificial lamb so we could more fully "compete" in MBB.
Makes sense for Dayton - they sell out almost all the time up there. But how much profit from that revenue do they clear, cause remember - they have to pay their coaching staff (likely 2 million or more), pay for charter flights, pay the gameday staff?, etc. I assume or hope they make a profit off that 18M, but who knows. But for schools, like UR - who don't turn a profit - would they be willing to add an annual $3M expense line item - Player payments.using Dayton as an example, they had $18.5M in men's basketball revenue in 22-23.
you could argue $3M is still a bargain.
using Dayton as an example, they had $18.5M in men's basketball revenue in 22-23.
you could argue $3M is still a bargain.
I don't know but we never seem to bat an eye when we extend Mooney's 7 figure contract and up his pay.So how much do we need to compete on the basketball side. If VCU is top of the league and they expect to average 300K per player (that is average, so some will be higher and some lower) - which comes out to about $3 million per year just for basketball if you only pay 10 players - do we really think UR wants to spend millions on paying basketball players?
Oh no - your in trouble now - you said the E word - ENDOWMENT. You know that can't be touched. All that money is earmarked, and invested, etc. Plus - if we use it and the Endowment goes down - its look really bad when comparing our school to other endowment rich institutions. But lets remember - 3 million to a 2 billion endowment is equal to a rounding error.I don't know but we never seem to bat an eye when we extend Mooney's 7 figure contract and up his pay.
And no, of course not, we don't really want to spend millions paying basketball players, nor does any college. But that is the reality now, they must. This is what a multi-billion dollar endowment allows us to do; absorb unanticipated costs like this.
From the JOC article at least, sounds like we are committed to be in the range Bernadette predicts, which is $1-3 million.But for schools, like UR - who don't turn a profit - would they be willing to add an annual $3M expense line item - Player payments
Me too. Positive sign, though, that UR is determined to be in the A10 and show this kind of commitment. A10 as a whole, I’m sure will also be committed to remain in that second tier just below P5s. So hopefully everyone who remains in the A10 will all be on the same page as far as it comes to this commitment.I hope we can stay in that second tier as long as possible.
lol, yeah I know revenue is not earnings.Now take out expenses. Revenue is not earnings.
They can from the endowment what they need. They are not going to pull 3 million specifically to pay the men's basketball players, but maybe they just pull an extra 3 million for University operations next year, and then we free up say 3 million in other university operations for our athletic department. We can move the shells around enough to cover thisOh no - your in trouble now - you said the E word - ENDOWMENT. You know that can't be touched. All that money is earmarked, and invested, etc. Plus - if we use it and the Endowment goes down - its look really bad when comparing our school to other endowment rich institutions. But lets remember - 3 million to a 2 billion endowment is equal to a rounding error.