This "horrible program" has a better basketball history than we do. We've been in the A10 for 20 years with them. I don't see how them going to a worse basketball conference now changes the point that they have expectations of their coach, which I presume is also championships and NCAAs, yet extended his contract when he achieved even less than Mooney did. I also bring up schools like NC State to show how a lot of schools have incentive clauses that give extensions for adding additional years in their contract based on conference and NCAA tournament results. For all we know, that could also be the case with us. Yes, I would love for UR to be more transparent with these things, but they aren't. Just who they are. Doesn't mean they don't have expectations of their coaches.Saying "hey this horrible basketball program does our special thing too!" isn't as great a look as you think it is. 🥱
I think you bring up a very good point about the AD wanting to keep stability and minimize the players going to the portal. With that reasoning, could it also have been reasonable that we extended Mooney's contract in 2020 when we saw guys like Gilly, Golden, Sherod, Cayo and felt that we didn't want to lose them to the transfer portal and keeping them on our roster was our best chance of making the NCAAs?They want/they really need stable seasoned leadership because their basketball program is going to see a lot of transition over the next few years moving to a lower ranked conference. I would imagine the portal will be full of UMass players when they make this transition and the players they get in return are not going to have the same pedigree of player that is leaving.