www.ncaa.com
We are missing our starting point guard, but Tyne seems to be getting better every game. He had a couple nice 3s and no turnovers.
Lowest "turnover rate" in the Country and strong "assist to turnover ratio" are very nice stats and something to take pride in. However, purist basketball fans would have to ask "how does a team that handles the ball that well go 4-3 against mediocre competition?" I'd like to hear an explanation.
OK, I'll bite. Colorado and Wichita are not mediocre, they're good. And they are better than we are.
Agreed. Both Colorado and Wichita are good teams. We are mediocre and our record proves that. We've basically lost to good teams, gone .500 against teams in our weight class and 3-0 against the cupcakes where we can just roll out superior talent.
Yeah, W&M might be that discussion of really bad. They at least have a few D-1 wins (2 to be exact). Buffalo and Lafayette both have not won a D-1 game yet, so that gets the really bad designation in my book.
This is more or less the Mooney Way, although usually there is a bad loss or two mixed in, so stay tuned...
William & Mary dressed 7 scholarship players last game.
Seems like hazing to force the other guys to sit there naked.
the other 6 dressed themselves!
Sans all the comic relief, the point was that they were missing a number of scholarship players not available to play because of injury. Not sure of their attire or how many non-scholarship players were available dressed or not.
In all seriousness, It appears they only played 7 scholarship players the game before as well. One with no stats in 11 minutes.
That's for damn sure. Unimpressive campus and state for that matter. They've had recent success, but I wasn't overly impressed by their crowd support or arena. Nice. But our crowd and arena is nicer. No reason we can't be what they are - a regular NCAA participant, along with more consistent runs to the Sweet 16 and even a run to the Final 4.
And he is only playing 32 minutes per game.
